Title :
link :
From David French at NRO:“Not an avid gun guy at all...where the hell did he get automatic weapons? He has no military background,” gunman’s brother says http://pic.twitter.com/EMSKLQGYFM— CBS News (@CBSNews) October 2, 2017
Before I begin, let me clearly state two things. First, as I note in the title of this post, my observations are based on early reports, and early reports are often wrong. Second, do not read this post as implying any sort of conspiracy theory of any kind. I’m merely noting the facts as we currently understand them — and how they differ from recent mass shootings.
As virtually everyone has noted from the abundant video footage of the incident, it certainly sounds as if the shooter used either fully-automatic weapons or semi-automatic weapons modified (through, for example, a bump fire stock) to closely simulate automatic fire.
Moreover, the police are reporting that he had “more than 10 rifles.”
He apparently rented his corner room for days and may have even set up cameras to detect when police were approaching.
That’s all strange enough, but it’s even more unusual when you consider that his own family apparently didn’t know that he maintained a stockpile of guns.
Here’s this, from the gunman’s brother, suggesting that the gunman wasn’t an avid gun guy at all: Put all this together, and the shooting is flat-out bizarre. It’s significantly different from virtually any other mass shooting in U.S. history.
If the weapons were fully automatic, then he likely would have spent immense sums of money to obtain them legally, jumping through extensive legal hoops.
This twitter thread, from Stephen Gutowski, is very helpful:GO READ THE WHOLE THING.
Thus Article
That's an article
This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article with the link address https://notsomeimportant.blogspot.com/2017/10/not-avid-gun-guy-at-all.html
0 Response to " "
Post a Comment