Title : UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason”
link : UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason”
UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason”
Surely, AND obviously.
But in today's world, saying the obvious will cost a man in "the court of public opinion, which is an echo chamber created by the seditious Government-Media/Academic Complex.
From Jihad Watch:
A Conservative Party member of the House of Lords has called for hate preachers and jihadi brides to be tried for treason, decrying the “inadequate sentence” of recently-released Islamic State supporter Anjem Choudary.
Former Justice Minister Lord Faulks QC called for an amendment to the Counter Terrorism and Security Bill in the Upper House of Parliament on Wednesday, adding an offence of treason to adequately punish those “waging war against your own country.”
“Those who live and benefit from life in the United Kingdom yet involve themselves in attacks against the United Kingdom either here or abroad are surely guilty of treason,” the Peer said.
“Are we too timid to call it that? Is it because allegiance to our country is considered unfashionable? If so, that seems to me to verge on the decadent, or at the very least it shows a country lacking in self-confidence.
“Those who reject the values of this country have the option of relinquishing their citizenship. But while they remain here or regard it as their home, surely they owe a duty to other citizens, who have their own human rights. This new definition of treason is a way of underlining that duty.”
Lord Faulks singled out the case of Anjem Choudary, the Islamist hate preacher who was convicted of encouraging support of Islamic State, criticising his short prison sentence and the “considerable amount of our resources will be spent on monitoring his activities” since he was released from prison on October 19th, less than halfway through his five-and-a-half-year sentence.
“What he did was undoubtedly a betrayal of his country. He acted as a recruiting agent for a group that intended to cause and has caused attacks on the United Kingdom, and which the UK faces abroad. He would be guilty of treason” under his proposal, the Peer pointed out.
Telling the chamber that some 900 British terror suspects went to Syria and Iraq during the conflicts, “described by our senior counterterrorism officer as a ‘big national security threat,’” he said they should face “immediate arrest and questioning,” saying that “brides of Jihad — who will or may claim duress or in other ways try and distance themselves from what others may have done,” are likewise traitors….
Thus Article UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason”
That's an article UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason” This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.
You are now reading the article UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason” with the link address https://notsomeimportant.blogspot.com/2018/11/uk-peer-those-who-live-in-uk-yet.html
0 Response to "UK peer: “Those who live in the UK yet involve themselves in attacks against the UK are surely guilty of treason”"
Post a Comment